Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JULY 2019

Mainland Or Mirage: Strategic Considerations For The USPTO's Motion To Amend Pilot Program

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

For years, many patent owners navigating AIA proceedings have complained that existing procedures prevented them from amending their claims

United StatesIntellectual Property

For years, many patent owners navigating AIA proceedings have complained that existing procedures prevented them from amending their claims. Seeking to address some of these concerns, the USPTO recently released an optional pilot program for motions to amend (MTA) that applies to AIA trial proceedings instituted on or after March 15, 2019.1Assuming this program achieves its goal of facilitating claim amendment, both patent owners and petitioners may want to recalibrate their strategies—patent owners on whether to pursue amendments; and petitioners on whether to pursue an AIA challenge in the first place. Legal issues beyond the scope of the claims, like the doctrine of intervening rights, can make the desired destination illusory.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from