Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 DECEMBER 2015

Judge Leval Illuminates Google Books Fair Use Issues - Second Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment For Defendant In Massive Copying Case

Plaintiffs argued that Google's copying should not be deemed a fair use because digitization and storage of plaintiffs' works exposes them to the risk that hackers might access and make the books widely available.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Based on the defense of fair use, the Second Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Google in the decade-long copyright battle between an authors group and the Internet search giant. The lawsuit concerned Google's right to copy millions of books in order to allow snippet searches and text/data mining of the works. Making digital copies "to provide a search function is a transformative use," the panel held, "which augments public knowledge by making available information about Plaintiffs' books without providing the public with a substantial substitute for matter protected by the Plaintiffs' copyright...." Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2015).

To many legal observers, the outcome seemed obvious in light of the limited uses to which Google sought to affix the imprimatur of fair use. But the opinion, authored by Judge Pierre Leval, takes a number of original turns in reaching this conclusion. Twenty-five years ago, Judge Leval wrote the seminal

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from