Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 JULY 2023

ITC Spotlight ‑ July 2023 Edition

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Contributor
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

In an increasingly global and interconnected world, Hughes Hubbard sets itself apart as a robust...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Eighteen years ago this week, eBay, Inc. filed its petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court challenging a Federal Circuit decision that applied its "general rule...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Is It Time to Get Real About the Public Interest Factors?

Eighteen years ago this week, eBay, Inc. filed its petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court challenging a Federal Circuit decision that applied its "general rule that courts will issue permanent injunctions against patent infringement absent exceptional circumstances."1 The Supreme Court opinion that issued almost a year later dramatically changed the way injunctions are handled in patent cases in federal district courts, holding that injunctions in patent cases are to be treated no differently than in other types of cases and are subject to the traditional four-factor test.

Following eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange LLC,2 the Federal Circuit in Spansion Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, held that the remedies in the International Trade Commission ("ITC" or "the Commission")—exclusion orders and cease and desist orders—are different creatures than injunctions in district court and, accordingly, are not subject

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from