Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2013

IP Update, Vol. 16, No. 1, January 2013

Federal Circuit Clarifies ITC Domestic Industry Requirement for Non-Practicing Entities.

United StatesIntellectual Property

IP UPDATE: Edited by Paul Devinsky and Rita Weeks

Patents / International Trade Commission

Federal Circuit Clarifies ITC Domestic Industry Requirement for Non-Practicing Entities

By Christopher G. Paulraj

In an opinion that further reinforces the authority of the U.S. International Trade Commission's (ITC) to conduct Section 337 investigations initiated by non-practicing entities, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that if the asserted patent covers the article that is the subject of the proceeding and the party seeking relief can show substantial investment in exploitation of the patent so as to satisfy the domestic industry requirement, that party is entitled to seek relief under section 337.  InterDigital Communications, LLC v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, Case No. 10-1093 (Fed. Cir., Jan. 10, 2013) (Bryson, J.) (Newman, J., dissenting). 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from