Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 APRIL 2016

Insurer Gets Smoked For Defense Coverage In Illinois

The Court recently found in favor of the e-cigarette vendor seeking coverage for the defense of trademark related claims against it, construing ambiguities in the policy in favor of the insured.

United StatesIntellectual Property

An e-cigarette vendor has defense coverage because an Illinois federal judge found that the party suing it "has a very thin reed on which to rest a disparagement claim that is potentially separate and distinct from its trademark infringement claims." The Court recently found in favor of the e-cigarette vendor seeking coverage for the defense of trademark related claims against it, construing ambiguities in the policy in favor of the insured.  The language at issue is typical of language in the personal and advertising injury coverage in commercial general liability policies.

Brent Duke and 21 Century Smoking, Inc. (the e-cigarette vendor) were sued by DR Distributors, LLC, CB Distributors, Inc., and Carlos Bengoa in a trademark infringement and unfair competition lawsuit.  21 Century put its insurer, Diamond State Insurance Company, on notice and Diamond defended the insured pursuant to a reservation of rights.  After some time, the insurer filed a declaratory

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from