Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JUNE 2026

IBR And Fair Use: What Congress Needs To Fix In The Pro Codes Act

Gesmer Updegrove LLP
Gesmer Updegrove LLP
Contributor
Gesmer Updegrove LLP

Gesmer Updegrove LLP

The Firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP is a Boston-based law firm serving technology companies, emerging...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gesmer Updegrove LLP

Courts have increasingly ruled that private standards incorporated into law by reference may be freely published under fair use doctrine, threatening the financial model of standards development organizations.

United StatesIntellectual Property
Andrew Updegrove
Andrew Updegrove

In 2023, we wrote about the D.C. Circuit’s decision in American Society for Testing and Materials v. Public.Resource.Org (ASTM II), which held that a nonprofit organization’s free online publication of technical standards incorporated by reference (IBR) into law constituted copyright fair use. We expressed concern that the decision underestimated the threat to the delicate symbiotic relationship between standards development organizations (SDOs) and the governments that rely on their work, and we called for a legislative solution. Since then, the legal landscape has shifted further, and not in the SDOs’ favor. A new court decision and pending federal legislation have brought this issue to a head, and we think it’s time for an update.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from