Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MAY 2020

High Court Booking.com Case Highlights Stale TM Test

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

Aside from a little static, Monday's oral arguments in the US Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com BV case went off without a hitch — the first telephonic argument before the US Supreme Court...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Aside from a little static, Monday's oral arguments in the US Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com BV case went off without a hitch — the first telephonic argument before the US Supreme Court, necessitated in this age of COVID-19.

Novelty was not limited to the telephonic appearance of the court and parties: The legal issue presented itself required the court to square old-fashioned statutory text and case law with the modern, plugged-in world.

Earlier Proceedings

The central question in the case was whether adding ".com" to an otherwise generic term somehow transforms that term into a trademark. In particular, at issue was the registrability of "Booking.com," the domain name that points to Booking.com's popular internet reservation website.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from