Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MAY 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - May 2016

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

While the Board's requirements are strict ones, they are requirements of which petitioners are aware when they seek to institute an IPR."

United StatesIntellectual Property

View previous updates...



Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd. (No. 2015-1693, 5/9/16) (O'Malley, Wallach, Hughes)

O'Malley, J. Affirming Board decision in inter partes review that challenged claims, related to labeling nucleotides, were not obvious. While the Court agreed with the Board's conclusion of obviousness, the Court criticized the Board's analysis of "reasonable expectation of success." "The Board seemed to believe that the 'reasonable expectation of success' inquiry looked to whether one would reasonably expect the prior art references to operate as those references intended once combined. That is not the correct inquiry—one must have a motivation to combine accompanied by a reasonable expectation of achieving what is claimed in the patent-at-issue." Also, the Board properly rejected new arguments raised in the petitioner's reply. "Unlike district court litigation—where parties have greater freedom to revise and develop

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from