Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2025

Federal Circuit Clarifies Concept Of "Conception"

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a significant opinion in Regents of the University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc.,[1] providing fundamental guidance on the legal standard of "conception" in patent law.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a significant opinion in Regents of the University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc.,1 providing fundamental guidance on the legal standard of "conception" in patent law. The decision vacates the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) 2022 interference ruling in the long-running CRISPR-Cas9 patent dispute and remands the case for further consideration under the clarified standard. While interferences are close to becoming obsolete as there are few pending pre-AIA applications still eligible for interference proceedings, the decision is still highly relevant in other post-AIA contexts.

CRISPR-Cas9: A Nobel-Prized Technology

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from