Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JUNE 2017

Cover All Your Bases In ITC Discovery

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Certain Access Control Systems and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1016 (May 31, 2017), is a good lesson in covering all your bases.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Certain Access Control Systems and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1016 (May 31, 2017), is a good lesson in covering all your bases.  Relying on a non-infringement decision by ALJ Pender, respondents assumed that they did not need to present an invalidity case, and they failed to take certain relevant discovery.  When Judge Pender's decision was reversed by the Commission, they tried to get that discovery.  Judge Pender ruled that it was too late.

The Chamberlain Group, Inc. ("CGI") alleged that a group of respondents infringe three U.S. Patents including U.S. Patent No. 7,161,319.  All the claims of the '319 Patent require a "wall console."  Respondents argued at the Markman hearing, and Judge Pender agreed, that "wall console" should be construed as "a wall-mounted control unit including a passive infrared detector."  Order No. 13 (Jan. 26, 2017).  The parties stipulated to non-infringement under that construction and Judge Pender so ordered.  Order No. 23

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from