Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 FEBRUARY 2021

CAFC Patent Cases, 1/12/21 – 2/2/21

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Bryson, J. Affirming PTAB decision that references qualified as prior art. Also vacating decision that claim was unpatentable and remanding.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Precedential Federal Circuit Opinions

  1. M & K HOLDINGS, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. [OPINION] (2020-1160, 2/1/2021) (Moore, Bryson, Chen)
    Bryson, J. Affirming PTAB decision that references qualified as prior art. Also vacating decision that claim was unpatentable and remanding. Substantial evidence supported the Board's conclusion that the relevant references could have been located through reasonable diligence, given that the references were publicly accessible through the combination of oral presentations at the meetings of an industry task force and the hosting of documents on the website of the task force. Regarding unpatentability, the Board erred by finding challenged claim anticipated when the petition asserted only obviousness. “Although [patent owner] was aware of the prior art used to invalidate [the claim] given the obviousness combination asserted against that claim, [patent owner] was not put on notice that the Board might find that [the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from