Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 NOVEMBER 2018

Assignor Estoppel Does Not Apply To IPRs

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Assignor estoppel is a long-established, common-law doctrine of equity, which prevents a party who assigns a patent to another from later challenging the validity of the assigned patent.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Assignor estoppel is a long-established, common-law doctrine of equity, which prevents a party who assigns a patent to another from later challenging the validity of the assigned patent.  The doctrine also applies to parties in privity with an estopped assignor, such as a corporation founded by the assignor.  On November 9 however, the Federal Circuit (the "Court") handed down a decision in Arista Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., 17-1525, which says that assignor estoppel does not apply to Inter Parte Review (IPR) proceedings.

Arista petitioned for an IPR of certain claims of a U.S. Patent No. 7,340,597 owned by Cisco. The named inventor is Dr. David Cheriton, who at the time of the invention was employed by Cisco as a technical advisor and chief product architect.  Dr. Cheriton assigned his entire right, title and interest in his invention to Cisco, and shortly thereafter, left Cisco to co-found Arista.  Dr. Cheriton once served as a director of Arista and was

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from