Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2021

William Gray v. Quicken Loans, Inc.

In Gray v. Quicken Loans, Inc., 61 Cal.App.5th 524 (March 2, 2021), the California Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order dismissing a class action pursuant to a demurrer filed by Quicken Loans, Inc.

United StatesInsurance

(Civil Code Section 2954.8 Does Not Require a Lender to Pay Interest on Insurance Proceeds Held in Escrow For Payment of Repairs For Damage Sustained by Home Covered by Property Insurance)

(April 2021) - In Gray v. Quicken Loans, Inc., 61 Cal.App.5th 524 (March 2, 2021), the California Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order dismissing a class action pursuant to a demurrer filed by Quicken Loans, Inc. (“Quicken”). The class action filed by William Gray argued that pursuant to California Civil Code section 2954.8, Quicken was obligated to pay interest on insurance proceeds paid into an escrow account for the purpose of funding repairs to homes that had sustained damage covered by property policies. In affirming the trial court's order dismissing the Gray lawsuit, the Court of Appeal reasoned as follows:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from