Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2021

Wexler v. California Fair Plan Association

The Talbots alleged smoke damage from the Woolsey wildfire in 2018, but the Talbots claims were not at issue and were previously dismissed with prejudice.

United StatesInsurance

(Bad Faith Action Dismissed as Plaintiff Was Not an Insured and Had No Insurable Interest in Home Covered by Property Policy)

(August 2021) -  Wexler v. California Fair Plan Assoc., 63 Cal.App.5th 55 (April 14, 2021), discussed several important issues, finding: (1) individuals who are not specifically named under the policy are not third party beneficiaries and cannot sue for bad faith; (2) there is no "special relationship" between an insurer and an insured; and (3) an individual not named on a property policy does not have an "insurable interest" under the policy.

Brooke Wexler lived with her parents in a home in a mountainous area facing a fire danger. Wexler's parents, Kimberly and James Talbot, owned the home and were insured by a California FAIR Plan. FAIR Plan was created by the California legislature to give homeowners in high risk areas access to basic property insurance. The Talbots alleged smoke damage from the Woolsey wildfire in 2018, but the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from