Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2021

Vulk v. State Farm General Insurance Company

In Vulk et al. v. State Farm General In. Co., ---Cal.App.5th --- (September 23, 2021), the California Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a summary judgment entered in favor of State Farm General Insurance Company...

United StatesInsurance

(Summary Judgment In Favor Of Insurer Affirmed As Insureds Failed To Show Misrepresentation Regarding The Amount Of Coverage Afforded For Homes Destroyed By Wildfire)

(October 2021) - In Vulk et al. v. State Farm General In. Co., ---Cal.App.5th --- (September 23, 2021), the California Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a summary judgment entered in favor of State Farm General Insurance Company (“State Farm”) against property owner, Gary Andrighetto (“Andrighetto”), in connection with a complaint for breach of contract, negligence, bad faith and violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200 related to the destruction of Andrighetto's home by a wildfire known as the “Boles Fire” in September 2014. Andrighetto alleged that State Farm, through its agent, had underinsured his home such that he did not have sufficient limits to completely rebuild the home.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from