Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 SEPTEMBER 2011

Title Insurer’s Negligent Title Search Precludes Subrogation

The recent decision in "Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. MHD Corp.", 2010 WL 4157301 (Ohio Ct. App. Oct. 22, 2010), addressed whether a title insurer was subrogated to the rights of its insured against a seller where the insurer’s negligent title search failed to report a properly recorded encumbrance on the property. The court ruled the title insurer was not entitled to subrogation.

United StatesInsurance
Brian Levy
Brian Levy

The recent decision in Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. MHD Corp., 2010 WL 4157301 (Ohio Ct. App. Oct. 22, 2010), addressed whether a title insurer was subrogated to the rights of its insured against a seller where the insurer's negligent title search failed to report a properly recorded encumbrance on the property.  The court ruled the title insurer was not entitled to subrogation.

In November 1991, MHD Corporation ("MHD") purchased 12.74 acres of real property from S&S Realty, Inc. ("S&S") pursuant to a warranty deed that contained a right of first refusal on the premises retained by S&S.  Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation ("Lawyers Title") acted as the escrow agent and title agent for the sale and, in such capacity, it recorded the warranty deed and issued a title guaranty.  The title guaranty did not list the right of first refusal retained by S&S.  

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from