Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MAY 2013

Third Circuit Holds That Premises Exclusion Bars Coverage And Limits Application Of "Pacific Indemnity v. Linn"

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

A discussion on a recent case where the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, applying Pennsylvania law, reversed the district court’s summary judgment order holding that a general liability insurer had a duty to defend and indemnify a policyholder in a lawsuit seeking damages resulting from an accident occurring off the policyholder’s premises.

United StatesInsurance

In American Western Home Insurance Company v. Donnelly Distribution, Inc., No. 11-3753, slip op. (3d Cir. April 26, 2013), available at 2013 WL 1777267, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, applying Pennsylvania law, reversed the district court’s summary judgment order holding that a general liability insurer had a duty to defend and indemnify a policyholder in a lawsuit seeking damages resulting from an accident occurring off the policyholder’s premises.

The policyholder in American Western, a newspaper distributor, had been sued by a woman who claimed that she was injured when she slipped and fell on plastic ties that bind materials the policyholder distributes, and that its employees negligently discarded.  Id. at *1.  The policy at issue contained a provision “restricting coverage to bodily injuries ‘arising out of . . . [t]he ownership maintenance or use’ of [the Howard Street Premises] and operations ‘necessary or incidental’ to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from