Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JANUARY 2016

Prompt Payment Required Under Policy Cannot Be Delayed Due To Potential For Contractual Indemnity

Cameron International Corporation, the manufacturer of the blow out preventer, was one of the Deepwater Horizon defendants in thousands of suits arising from the 2010 Macondo Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

United StatesInsurance

Case:   Cameron International Corp. v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
No. 14-3132; November 19, 2015

Cameron International Corporation, the manufacturer of the blow out preventer, was one of the Deepwater Horizon defendants in thousands of suits arising from the 2010 Macondo Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Cameron had a tower of insurance of $500 million, included within which was a policy issued by Liberty Insurance Underwriters, covering Cameron's exposure between $100 million and $150 million.

There were contracts between the various parties, through which Cameron claimed contractual indemnity from Transocean and Transocean claimed indemnity for that alleged obligation from BP. Those obligations were denied and not resolved.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from