Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JUNE 2026

Pro-Policyholder Trend Continues In TVPRA Coverage Litigation

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

Recent federal court decisions have established important precedents for insurance coverage in sex trafficking lawsuits, particularly those involving hotels under the Trafficking Victims...

United StatesInsurance

In a pro-policyholder trend, multiple federal courts have recently resolved several important insurance coverage issues arising from underlying lawsuits alleging sex trafficking.

In recent years, general liability insurers have increasingly disclaimed their defense obligations to hotel franchisors or operators sued for allegedly benefiting from the use of their hotels by third-party criminals using the hotels as a location to commit criminal sex trafficking, including claims brought under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Insurers regularly argue, inter alia, that coverage is barred by: (1) public policy; (2) abuse or molestation exclusions; or (3) policy limitations regarding the insureds’ subjective intent or knowledge. In February 2026, however, the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana rejected an insurer’s effort to evade its obligation to defend a hotel franchisor and franchisee/operator in a TVPRA action, granting summary

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from