Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2013

Minnesota Supreme Court Holds Absolute Pollution Exclusion Covers Carbon Monoxide

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

A discussion on the importance of the Wolters ruling.

United StatesInsurance

In Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Wolters, __ N.W.2d __, 2013 WL 2363239 (Minn. May 31, 2013), the Minnesota Supreme Court, applying Minnesota law,  affirmed the court of appeals ruling that an absolute pollution exclusion in a general liability policy encompasses carbon monoxide released inside a home by a negligently installed boiler.  The court found the definition of “pollutant” unambiguously applied to carbon monoxide.

In Wolters, a general contractor improperly installed a boiler, as well as the carbide monoxide detectors, in a personal residence.  Id. at *2.  The home owners suffered carbon monoxide poisoning and brought litigation against the contractor.  Id.  The contractor’s insurer appointed defense counsel, subject to a reservation of rights, and initiated a declaratory judgment action, seeking a ruling that it had no duty to defend or indemnify because coverage was barred under the absolute pollution exclusion.  Id.  The district court

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from