Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JANUARY 2020

McHugh v. Protective Life Insurance Company

On January 9, 2013, McHugh failed to pay his premium.

United StatesInsurance

In McHugh v. Protective Life Ins., 40 Cal. App. 5th, 1166 (2019), the Court of Appeal affirmed a jury verdict in favor of a life insurance company, holding that statutes extending the required grace period before a policy can be terminated for nonpayment of premium do not apply retroactively to policies issued before the effective date of the statutes.

Protective Life Insurance ("Protective Life") issued a 60-year term life insurance policy to William Patrick McHugh in 2005. The policy provided for a 31-day grace period before Protective Life could terminate it for failure to pay the premium.

On January 1, 2013, Insurance Code sections 10113.71 and 10113.72 (the "Statutes") came into effect, requiring life insurance policies to provide for a 60-day grace period before they could be terminated for nonpayment of premium.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from