Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JULY 2010

Chinese Drywall Losses Continue for Policyholders

The federal court in Norfolk, Va., continues to serve as the epicenter of insurance coverage cases involving Chinese drywall – and not for the benefit of policyholders.

United StatesInsurance

The federal court in Norfolk, Va., continues to serve as the epicenter of insurance coverage cases involving Chinese drywall – and not for the benefit of policyholders. Judge Robert Doumar recently issued a ruling that will make the fight for insurance coverage harder for policyholders. See Travco Insurance Co. v. Ward, Case No. 2:10-cv-14 (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division). While Travco involves a first-party homeowner's policy, its implications are much broader.

In the ruling, Judge Doumar held that installation of defective drywall was a "direct physical loss" under terms of the insurance contract. The loss is covered. However, he further found that several exclusions apply to ultimately nix coverage for the drywall.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from