Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 AUGUST 2015

Another Disappointed "Additional Insured"

Butler Snow LLP
Butler Snow LLP
Contributor
Butler Snow LLP

Butler Snow LLP

Some law firms promise client service. Butler Snow delivers on that promise. Surveys by respected...

View firm profile
Explore more from Butler Snow LLP

No contract clause is more common than the one that says, in effect, "B promises to carry commercial general liability insurance, and to make A an 'Additional Insured' under B's policy."

United StatesInsurance

No contract clause is more common than the one that says, in effect, "B promises to carry commercial general liability insurance, and to make A an 'Additional Insured' under B's policy." And perhaps no contract clause produces more disappointment.

For one thing, as many competent observers have noted, "Additional Insured" endorsements vary widely: to demand that someone make you "an 'Additional Insured'" is akin to sitting down in a restaurant and ordering "some food."

And many of the dishes are entirely unpalatable. For example, many "Additional Insured" endorsements are limited to the Additional Insured's vicarious liability for the acts of the Named Insured. This is almost certain to cause heartache for the Additional Insured. Suppose Polly Plaintiff, while working for her employer (the Named Insured), falls off her employer's ladder. If she sues her employer, she'll face the worker's comp bar.   Better to sue the owner of the building (the Additional

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from