Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 NOVEMBER 2025

Ambiguities Bite Back: Second Circuit Reaffirms Commitment To Construing Ambiguous Terms In Favor Of Coverage

Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Contributor
Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Lowenstein Sandler LLP is a national law firm with over 400 lawyers based in New York, Palo Alto,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lowenstein Sandler LLP

The Second Circuit's recent decision affirming a $54.2 million recovery for CITGO signals the judiciary's renewed commitment to a bedrock principle of insurance law: Ambiguous policy language must be construed in favor of coverage.

United StatesInsurance

The Second Circuit's recent decision affirming a $54.2 million recovery for CITGO signals the judiciary's renewed commitment to a bedrock principle of insurance law: Ambiguous policy language must be construed in favor of coverage. This rule of construction recognizes that insurance policies are risk-transfer products underwritten and sold by insurance companies – not ordinary commercial contracts. Accordingly, courts should not resort to extrinsic evidence in an effort to divine what an insurance company may have intended with respect to ambiguous policy language. Instead, as a rule, courts will automatically construe ambiguities in favor of the policyholder.

The Second Circuit Decision

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from