Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JULY 2018

ACOD B – A 1980s Design Success

The special features of mesothelioma (its "indivisible" nature and its long latency) have thrown up many complex legal questions resulting in the creation of special mesothelioma jurisprudence...

United StatesInsurance

The special features of mesothelioma (its "indivisible" nature and its long latency) have thrown up many complex legal questions resulting in the creation of special mesothelioma jurisprudence and legislation governing the liabilities arising from the disease and how insurance should respond. Those developments have taken nearly 20 years, but the courts have not (yet) directly addressed how mesothelioma claims should be allocated to reinsurance programmes. None of the decisions in the "Fairchild enclave" directly addresses reinsurance.

From about 1984, an ACOD B clause was inserted in many, perhaps most, relevant London market excess of loss reinsurance contracts. The clause sets out an allocation methodology for claims arising from "occupational disease or physical impairment which does not arise from a sudden and identifiable occurrence", where the employer's liability to the victim is "established on an exposure basis". Mesothelioma, along with many

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from