Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 APRIL 2016

50 Cent Explains Inconsistencies

Fox Rothschild LLP
Fox Rothschild LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Fox Rothschild LLP

I'll share more news on Jackson's proposed happy ending next week.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Since my March 28th post, Curtis James Jackson III, better known as rapper 50 Cent ("Jackson"), filed his sixteen-page, Court ordered explanation ("Disclosure") regarding the differences between his original Schedules and Statement of Financial Affairs ("SOFA") and his subsequent amendments.

Inthe Disclosurehis attorneys state that "the true benchmark is whether the debtor's intent to be transparent with creditors, responsive to their requests for information and willing to produce documents and information necessary to address concerns. Here, the debtor has overwhelmingly met his obligations in good faith."

The majority of Jackson's explanation appears to be based on the complexity his numerous business ventures and his (or his professionals) initial uncertainty over the ownership of certain property (including the Georgia condominiumand all the automobiles), thevalue of his businesses, and the existence or status of numerous contracts by Jackson and his

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from