Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 DECEMBER 2005

Supreme Court Docket Report – 2005 Term, No. 3

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Recently the Supreme Court granted certiorari in one case of interest to the business community. Amicus briefs in support of the petitioner will be due on December 15, 2005, and amicus briefs in support of the respondents will be due on January 19, 2006.

United StatesImmigration

Originally published October 31, 2005

Recently the Supreme Court granted certiorari in one case of interest to the business community. Amicus briefs in support of the petitioner will be due on December 15, 2005, and amicus briefs in support of the respondents will be due on January 19, 2006.

Patent Law—Patents of Natural Phenomena.

U.S. law does not grant patent protection to laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas. E.g., Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 185 (1981). However, patents are considered appropriate in instances in which an inventor reduces such a phenomenon to a practical application. The Supreme Court today granted certiorari in Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc., No. 04-607, to determine whether a patent for a method of detecting a vitamin deficiency qualifies for patent protection, or instead merely identifies an unpatentable basic scientific fact.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from