Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2024

Reconsidering Repayment Agreements With Foreign Employees

It is not unusual for employers to require foreign employees to sign repayment agreements that require the employee to repay some or all required immigration...

United StatesImmigration

It is not unusual for employers to require foreign employees to sign repayment agreements that require the employee to repay some or all required immigration process costs if the employee terminates employment before the end of the contract term. Employers often use the contracts as a deterrent to employees leaving as soon as the immigration benefit is secured, not intending to enforce or collect damages. Employers may want to reconsider this retention strategy.

Civil claims brought under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) have argued that these repayment agreements, also known as claw-back or “damages for quitting” contracts, are akin to forced labor under the TVPA as employees are effectively unable to quit because of the prohibitive costs. Repayment contracts can be used in any industry but are especially prevalent with nursing staffing agencies. The TVPA claims, in theory, can be brought by any plaintiff who feels burdened by a reimbursement agreement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from