Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JULY 2013

Immigration Implications Of Supreme Court’s DOMA Ruling

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, the provision of the law barring the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages, is unconstitutional.

United StatesImmigration
Lisa Burton
Lisa Burton
Malcolm Goeschl
Malcolm Goeschl
Tracy Evlogidis
Tracy Evlogidis
Eleanor Pelta
Eleanor Pelta

Court's holding that section 3 of the act is unconstitutional will allow U.S. nationals to sponsor same-sex spouses for immigration benefits.

On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)—the provision of the law barring the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages—is unconstitutional.1

DOMA, which was signed into law in 1996, precluded same-sex married couples from receiving many of the benefits available under federal law to heterosexual married couples. Because immigration law is federal, one such precluded benefit was the ability to sponsor a spouse for an immigration benefit. While U.S. citizens and permanent residents in heterosexual marriages are permitted to sponsor a spouse from another country to reside legally in the United States, U.S. citizens and permanent residents in same-sex marriages have been unable to do so.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from