Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2023

Immigrating To The United States: EB-2 Or EB-5 Visa?

Harvey Law Group
Explore more from Harvey Law Group

Immigrating to the United States is undoubtedly much sought-after for many people around the world.

United StatesImmigration
Harvey Law Group
Harvey Law Group
Author LinkedIn connections

Immigrating to the United States is undoubtedly much sought-after for many people around the world. The EB-2 and EB-5 visa categories would grant you, your spouse, and children under 21 Green Cards (permanent residency status) after which US citizenship can be obtained after merely 5 years of residence in the US. Obtaining either of these immigrant visas would be highly desirable.

The main distinction between the two visa categories is that the EB-2 visa would require you to have a sponsoring employer (unless applying for a national interest waiver) whereas the EB-5 visa would only require a qualifying investment. Each visa has its own distinct criteria and would reap its own set of unique benefits.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

October 2026 Visa Bulletin Advances EB-5 Filing Date For Mainland China By 4 Years

The U.S. Department of State has released the October 2026 Visa Bulletin, marking the start of fiscal year 2027 with significant changes to employment-based immigrant visa categories. How will the advancement of priority dates, particularly the substantial four-year leap for mainland China-born EB-5 investors in the Dates for Filing chart, impact eligible applicants seeking adjustment of status benefits?
GlobalImmigration
Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Article

DHS Continues Work Authorization For Ukrainian, Sudanese TPS Beneficiaries; I-9 Guidance Remains Unclear

The Department of Homeland Security has not issued formal determinations for Temporary Protected Status designations for Ukraine and Sudan despite the October 19, 2026 expiration date, creating uncertainty for employers navigating Form I-9 compliance and employment authorization documentation. USCIS states that affected individuals retain TPS protections and work authorization, but has not updated operational guidance to explain how employers should document continued employment eligibility or handle
United StatesImmigration
Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Article

DHS Proposes $70,000 And $30,000 Fees For F-1 Optional Practical Training

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed a controversial new rule requiring SEVP-certified schools to pay substantial fees—$70,000 for a student's first Optional Practical Training recommendation and $30,000 for each subsequent OPT application, including STEM extensions. With only a 30-day comment period and potential annual costs reaching up to $16.5 billion across nearly 2,500 affected institutions, the proposed regulation is expected to face significant legal challenges if finalized.
United StatesImmigration
Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Article

DHS Proposes New OPT Fees: What It Means For F-1 Students, Schools, Employers

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed imposing fees of $70,000 for initial Optional Practical Training periods and $30,000 for subsequent periods including STEM extensions, with schools bearing the direct cost burden. The proposal aims to combat fraud and abuse within the OPT program while protecting U.S. workers, but could significantly impact international student hiring strategies and the availability of OPT talent for employers.
United StatesImmigration
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Article

The 50-Year Rule In French Citizenship By Descent: What Article 30-3 Really Means For Your Case

For many applicants pursuing French citizenship by descent, one of the most significant hurdles is often Article 30 3 of the French Civil Code, commonly known as the “50 year rule.” This provision can extinguish an otherwise valid claim to French nationality if a family has lived abroad for more than fifty years without maintaining a demonstrable connection to France. Since the rule has been the subject of extensive litigation, understanding how French courts apply this provision is essential before investing time and resources into an application.
Hong KongGovernment, Public Sector
Harvey Law Group
Harvey Law Group
Article

Canadian Citizenship By Descent Landscape In 2026: Extended Processing Times, New Documentation Requirements, And What Applicants Should Know

Bill C-3 came into force in December 15, 2025 and Canadian citizenship by descent has since expanded beyond the former first-generation limit. Whilst this expanded framework has created significant new opportunities for thousands of individuals who may have Canadian lineage, born or adopted outside of Canada, recent developments have also demonstrated that obtaining Canadian citizenship by ancestry is no longer simply a matter of proving a distant family connection.
CanadaImmigration
Harvey Law Group
Harvey Law Group
Article

Four Roads To Hong Kong: Choosing The Right Visa Route For Work, Talent, Business, Or Investment

Hong Kong currently offers several major pathways for internationally mobile individuals to live, work, and eventually settle in the city: the General Employment Policy (GEP), the Top Talent Pass Scheme (TTPS), the Investment Visa (Entrepreneur), and the New Capital Investment Entrant Scheme (New CIES). Many prospective applicants, particularly successful founders, senior executives, and high-net-worth individuals, find they technically qualify for more than one of these routes.
Hong KongImmigration
Harvey Law Group
Harvey Law Group