Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JANUARY 2016

2nd Circuit Court Requires I-140 Revocation Notice: Analysis

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

The court did leave open a number of questions remanding the case back to the District Court for further proceedings.

United StatesImmigration

On December 30, 2015, the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled that US Citizenship and Immigration Services (SUCIS) must notify either the beneficiary of an approved I-140 or successor employer, of any intent to revoke the petition prior to revocation (Mantena v. Johnson, Docket No. 14-2476-cv, (2nd Cir., Dec. 30, 2015)). 

Case Summary

This case came up in the common situation of a foreign national being sponsored for permanent residence by an employer, but then changes employment to a new employer under rules allowing portability of employment after I-140 immigrant petition approval and after the I-485 adjustment of status application had been pending at least 180 days.  Prior to this case, USCIS only notified the petitioning employer of the I-140 of the intent to revoke or of revocation itself.  Revocation is often initiated by the I-140 petitioning employer when the employee leaves their employment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from