Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JULY 2016

Supreme Court Upholds Implied Certification In FCA Claims Litigation

Contractors may be liable under the False Claims Act if they violate legal requirements that are not related to conditions of payments.

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

In the highly anticipated decision in Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, 579 U.S. ____ (2016), the United States Supreme Court unanimously embraced the implied certification theory of liability under the False Claims Act, which could significantly expand healthcare providers' and other government contractors' potential exposure to expensive litigation and paralyzing judgments. Resolving a split among the circuits regarding this theory's scope and validity, the Court held that implied false certifications can be a basis for liability if two conditions are met:

  • A claim to the government for payment must make "specific representations about the goods or services provided," which is often the case by default if the contractor utilizes standard, government-issued billing or reimbursement forms; and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from