Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 AUGUST 2026

Recent Court Decision Highlights Effectiveness Of “Second Bite” Protests

Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Contributor
Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring’s Doha office is a full service legal practice that serves as the firm’s regional...

View firm profile
Explore more from Crowell & Moring LLP

A recent U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC) decision serves as an important reminder that when the Government Accountability Office (GAO) denies a protest, this is not necessarily the end of the road.

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

A recent U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC) decision serves as an important reminder that when the Government Accountability Office (GAO) denies a protest, this is not necessarily the end of the road. Often, contractors retain the right to file a new protest at the COFC, which conducts its own de novo review of the procurement record. This so-called “second bite at the apple” protest is a powerful tool as the COFC’s recent decision in Chugach Logistics & Facility Services JV, LLC v. USA makes clear.

In a post-award bid protest involving a nearly $100 million United States Navy Base Operations Support Contract (BOSC), Chugach Logistics and Facility Services JV, LLC (Chugach) filed a protest at GAO contesting the award of the BOSC to CCS King George 2, LLC (CCS KG). Chugach argued that the agency unreasonably evaluated proposals and made a flawed source selection decision. GAO denied the protest. Chugach then filed an action at the COFC. On August 17, 2026, the COFC reached a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from