Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 AUGUST 2016

High Court Inclusive Communities Ruling: 1 Year Later

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Last summer the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, holding that disparate impact discrimination claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act (FHA).

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

Last summer the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project,[1] holding that disparate impact discrimination claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act (FHA). Disparate impact liability arises when a policy or practice that is facially neutral results in a disproportionate disadvantage to a protected class and the policy or practice cannot be justified by a legitimate, nondiscriminatory business purpose.

Click here to continue reading

Originally published by Law360, August 19, 2016

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from