Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2023

Gov't Contracts Rulings Hold Termination Challenge Tips

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

Any default termination can be devastating for a contractor, especially an unwarranted one. Challenging a default termination can seem like a daunting, David versus Goliath endeavor...

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

Any default termination can be devastating for a contractor, especially an unwarranted one.

Challenging a default termination can seem like a daunting, David versus Goliath endeavor, but recent cases out of both the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the U.S. Civilian Board of Contract Appeals highlight several ways such challenges can be successful.

We discuss two such cases and the lessons contractors facing performance difficulties can learn from them.

Schneider Electric

First, in Schneider Electric Buildings Americas Inc. v. U.S.,1 the COFC considered the propriety of the government's "drastic decision of terminating Schneider for default after receiving 91.45% of the value of the contract" for implementation of certain energy conservation measures at a government facility.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from