Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 APRIL 2026

Compliance Notes - Vol. 7, Issue 8

Nossaman LLP
Nossaman LLP
Contributor
Nossaman LLP

Nossaman LLP

Our clients and our people are what define Nossaman. Our clients provide us with opportunities to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Nossaman LLP

Nossaman's Government Relations & Regulation Group delivers a curated digest of recent developments in campaign finance, lobbying compliance, election law, and government ethics.

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

RECENT LOBBYING, ETHICS & CAMPAIGN FINANCE UPDATES

Campaign Finance & Lobbying Compliance

Colorado: The Colorado Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday, April 21, 2026, on whether the state’s requirement that ballot measure committees disclose their registered agent’s name on political advertisements violates the First Amendment. The case arises from a 2020 campaign by No on EE — A Bad Deal for Colorado, an issue committee primarily funded by tobacco company Liggett Vector Brands that opposed Proposition EE, a state nicotine tax measure. No on EE spent more than $3 million on communications without listing its registered agent before correcting the omission after a voter complaint, and was fined $30,000 by the deputy secretary of state. The Colorado Court of Appeals struck down the disclosure requirement as facially unconstitutional, finding the state had not shown a substantial relationship between the government’s interest in informing voters and the disclosure of a registered

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from