Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 DECEMBER 2006

Second-Guessing A Chapter 11 Debtor’s "Absolute" Right To Convert

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Although federal bankruptcy law and policy strongly encourage both business and individual debtors to pay at least a portion of their debts by means of either a plan of reorganization or a wage earner repayment plan, the general rule is that a debtor cannot be forced to do so — a debtor always has the option to liquidate its assets in chapter 7 so long as it is eligible to be a debtor under that chapter of the Bankruptcy Code.

United StatesFinance and Banking

Although federal bankruptcy law and policy strongly encourage both business and individual debtors to pay at least a portion of their debts by means of either a plan of reorganization or a wage earner repayment plan, the general rule is that a debtor cannot be forced to do so — a debtor always has the option to liquidate its assets in chapter 7 so long as it is eligible to be a debtor under that chapter of the Bankruptcy Code. Even so, a trend appears to be developing in the bankruptcy courts whereby what is generally understood to be a debtor’s unfettered prerogative to convert its case from one of the "reorganization chapters" (chapters 11, 12 and 13) to a chapter 7 liquidation may be restricted under certain circumstances. A ruling recently handed down by a Michigan district court is emblematic of this restrictive approach. In Monroe Bank & Trust v. Pinnock, the court held that lawmakers’ use of the word "may" in section 1112(a) of the Bankruptcy Code means that a bankruptcy court

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from