Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2004

Rule 10b-5 and Related Considerations in Aquisition Agreements

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Rule 10b-5 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 generally makes it unlawful, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security, for a person to (i) make any untrue statement of a material fact or (ii) omit to state a material fact necessary to prevent the statements made from being misleading.

United StatesFinance and Banking

Rule 10b-5 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 generally makes it unlawful, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security, for a person to (i) make any untrue statement of a material fact or (ii) omit to state a material fact necessary to prevent the statements made from being misleading. Rule 10b-5 applies to purchases and sales of securities in M&A transactions as well as to more routine purchases and sales of securities.

In the United States, buyers in M&A transactions frequently request that the acquisition agreement include a representation modeled on Rule 10b-5. Sellers almost universally resist these requests. This article addresses certain matters that should be considered when negotiating the inclusion or exclusion of a so-called "10b-5" representation in an agreement for an M&A transaction that is subject to Rule 10b-5 (i.e., a transaction involving the purchase and sale of securities using jurisdictional means). This article also addresses the need to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from