Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 APRIL 2021

Firms Settle Separate FINRA Charges For Supervisory Failures Over "Alternative" Mutual Fund

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Three firms settled separate but largely similar FINRA charges for failing to reasonably supervise recommendations of the "alternative" mutual fund, the LJM Preservation and Growth Fund.

United StatesFinance and Banking

Three firms settled separate but largely similar FINRA charges for failing to reasonably supervise recommendations of the "alternative" mutual fund, the LJM Preservation and Growth Fund ("LJM"). (There is no legal definition of an "alternative" mutual fund.)

In the enforcement releases, FINRA defined alternative mutual funds as publicly offered funds seeking "to accomplish the funds' objectives through non-traditional investments and trading strategies." According to the enforcement releases, LJM "sold volatility," profiting from the difference between implied and realized market volatility, and was typically "net short or short volatility." Morningstar characterized LJM as "relatively aggressive and exposed to a steep rise in equity volatility," evidenced when the S&P 500 fell in February 2018 and caused an "unprecedented increase" in market volatility. This in turn dramatically increased the value of the short option positions, resulting in LJM losing about 80%

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from