Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2020

Firm Settles FINRA Charges For MSRB Reporting Violations

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for failing to submit certain interest rate information to the MSRB's Short-Term Obligation Rate Transparency system.

United StatesFinance and Banking

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for failing to submit certain interest rate information to the MSRB's Short-Term Obligation Rate Transparency ("SHORT") system, and for failing to establish and maintain a sufficient supervisory system.

According to the Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, the broker-dealer violated MSRB Rule G-34 ("CUSIP Numbers, New Issue, and Market Information Requirements") by failing to report to the MSRB's SHORT system the minimum denomination or maximum interest rate for variable rate demand obligations that it sold. FINRA alleged that the broker-dealer's reporting system did not require the entry of such information prior to transmitting data to the SHORT system. The missing minimum denomination information affected 27 CUSIPs, and the missing maximum interest rate information affected 30 CUSIPs. FINRA also charged the broker-dealer with violations of MSRB Rule G-27 ("Supervision") for failing to establish and maintain a sufficient

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from