Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MARCH 2021

Firm Settles FINRA Charges For Best Execution Violations

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

A firm settled FINRA charges for failing to ensure that its sales and purchases were as fair and favorable as possible to its customers.

United StatesFinance and Banking

A firm settled FINRA charges for failing to ensure that its sales and purchases were as fair and favorable as possible to its customers.

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, FINRA stated that the company purchased and sold corporate bonds at prices that were upwards of eight percent away from the relevant market, in violation of FINRA Rules 5310 ("Best Execution and Interpositioning") and 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade"). In addition, FINRA found that the company sold municipal securities to customers at prices that were approximately 40 percent away from the relevant market, in violation of MSRB Rules G-30 ("Prices and Commissions") and G-17 ("Conduct of Municipal Securities and Municipal Advisory Activities"). FINRA also determined that, in violation of MSRB Rules G-18 ("Best Execution") and G-27 ("Supervision"), and FINRA Rules 3110 ("Supervision") and 2010, the firm failed to create and maintain a supervisory

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from