Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JUNE 2016

Bitcoin Exchange Charged As Unregistered FCM

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

One of the questions raised by the CFTC's action is this: what does it mean to make a "delivery" in the case of commodities such as bitcoins?

United StatesFinance and Banking

The CFTC filed and simultaneously settled charges against a Hong Kong-based exchange for (i) offering illegal off-exchange financed retail commodity transactions in bitcoin and other "cryptocurrencies," and (ii) failing to register with the CFTC as a futures commission merchant ("FCM").

The CFTC found that the respondents (i) operated an online bitcoin trading platform that accepted users who did not meet the definition of "eligible contract participants" or "commercial entities," (ii) allowed those users to borrow funds from other platform users in order to trade bitcoins on a leveraged, margined or financed basis, and (iii) did not "actually deliver" such coins within 28 days of purchase but instead held the purchased bitcoins in "bitcoin deposit wallets" under its ownership. The CFTC also asserted that bitcoins fell within the definition of "commodities" in CEA Section 1a(9) and that, as a result of all these factors, the exchange engaged in illegal, off-exchange

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from