Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2016

Third Circuit Upholds Diligent Prosecution Bar To Citizen Suit Under Clean Air Act

The Third Circuit's ruling is in agreement with similar rulings by the 1st, 4th, 7th and 10th Circuits.

United StatesEnvironment

In May, 2014, Group Against Smog and Pollution (GASP) sued coke producer Shenango, Inc. under the Clean Air Act's (CAA) citizen suit provision for allegedly violating opacity limits in its air permit for its Neville Island, Pennsylvania facility.  Prior to that lawsuit, U.S. EPA, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) had sued Shenango in 2012 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and entered into a consent decree addressing opacity violations.  The Court retained jurisdiction to enforce the consent decree.  In 2014, ACHD sued Shenango in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas for opacity violations, resulting in a consent order reaffirming the 2012 consent decree and addressing further claims of violations.  Because of those legal actions by federal, state and county regulators, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on January 6

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from