Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 SEPTEMBER 2026

The “Harm Rule” Rescinding Protections Under The Endangered Species Act Creates Significant Uncertainty For Developers

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's new "Harm Rule" fundamentally reshapes Endangered Species Act enforcement by eliminating habitat modification as a form of prohibited "take," potentially requiring only direct, intentional acts against listed species to trigger federal protections.

United StatesEnvironment

The “Harm Rule” adopted by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) and National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) on July 14, 2026, and effective as of September 14, 2026, rescinds the longstanding regulatory definition of "harm" found in each agency’s Endangered Species Act (ESA) regulations.1 The practical effect of this change is that habitat modification or degradation is no longer considered "take" under the federal ESA. Perhaps even more significantly, though, a guidance memorandum issued by FWS2 reveals the sweeping scope of that agency’s interpretation of the Harm Rule, which extends well beyond mere recission of the prior regulatory definition of harm. Both the Harm Rule and the FWS’s interpretative guidance may usher in a new era in which FWS will only identify as “take” affirmative acts that are directed intentionally and immediately at listed species.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from