Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 SEPTEMBER 2026

Fifth Circuit Vacates EPA’s Methylene Chloride Rule: A Landmark Decision Reshaping TSCA Section 6

Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Contributor
Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring’s Doha office is a full service legal practice that serves as the firm’s regional...

View firm profile
Explore more from Crowell & Moring LLP

The Fifth Circuit's landmark decision in East Fork Enterprises v. EPA fundamentally reshapes how the agency must conduct chemical risk evaluations under TSCA, requiring condition-of-use-specific determinations and consideration of actual workplace protections. The ruling vacates EPA's methylene chloride risk management rule and establishes new standards for evaluating unreasonable risk that reject precautionary approaches and demand stronger evidentiary support. These holdings will force EPA to revise its p

United StatesEnvironment

Overview

On September 15, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a significant decision in East Fork Enterprises, Inc. v. EPA, vacating EPA’s 2024 methylene chloride risk management rule and the underlying revised unreasonable-risk determination under Section 6 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The court granted the industry petitioners’ challenge, denied Sierra Club’s petition, and remanded the matter to EPA.

The opinion reaches well beyond methylene chloride. The Fifth Circuit held that EPA may not make a “whole chemical” unreasonable-risk determination, must account for personal protective equipment (PPE) where the record shows it is actually or reasonably foreseeably used, and cannot treat TSCA as a zero-risk or precautionary statute. The court also found that EPA’s exposure limits lacked substantial evidence and that EPA failed to justify the breadth of its prohibitions, its treatment of economic consequences, and its assessment of feasible

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from