Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 NOVEMBER 1997

PCCIP Report And Key Recovery

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

United StatesEnvironment
By
Stewart Baker
([email protected])

Michael Hintze
([email protected])

November 1997

Attached below is the section dealing with encryption from the report of the President's Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection.

Much is being made of the fact that the report recommends the use of key recovery encryption systems. However, these relatively brief references to key recovery (just over a page out of a 102 page report and 74 pages of appendices) appears to be more a dutiful repetition of Administration policy than a thoughtful analysis of the hard issues. For example, there is no real discussion of why key recovery is preferable and there is no comparison of the relative merits of key recovery systems versus non-key recovery systems.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from