Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 APRIL 2009

A Step Closer To Regulatory Clarity? OPR Transmits Draft CEQA Guidelines To Resources Agency

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Lead agencies reviewing development project proposals under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) continue to struggle to reconcile the implications regarding the project’s impact on climate change with Assembly Bill 32’s mandate to reduce California’s greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

United StatesEnvironment

Lead agencies reviewing development project proposals under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") continue to struggle to reconcile the implications regarding the project's impact on climate change with Assembly Bill 32's1 mandate to reduce California's greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.  The absence of formal guidance has left lead agencies and project proponents facing significant risk and uncertainty, as they have attempted to analyze hard-to-quantify impacts, link the project causally to the global problem of climate change, and adopt defensible mitigation.  This state of uncertainty recently moved a grade closer to regulatory clarity as the Office of Planning and Research ("OPR") released a new version of proposed amendments to the CEQA Guidelines that is aimed at providing guidance on addressing climate change impacts ("Draft GHG Guidelines").2  While the draft amendments to the Guidelines must still undergo a formal rulemaking

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from