On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court issued Loper Bright
Enterprises et al v. Raimondo (‘Loper'),1
which overruled Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense
Council, Inc (‘Chevron').2
Chevron was a 40-year-old precedent that held that
courts must defer to an agency's interpretation of a statute
when that statute is silent or ambiguous, so long as the
agency's interpretation was
“permissible.”3 Chevron was
cited literally thousands of times in court orders upholding agency
regulations, and “Chevron deference” was
a central concept of administrative law.
The ripples from Chevron's end have already
begun to spread. Shortly after issuing Loper, the
Supreme Court vacated and remanded the D.C. Circuit's order
on Broadview Solar,4 which upheld the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (‘FERC' or
the ‘Commission') interpretation of “power
production capacity” under the Public Utility Regulatory
Policies Act of 1978 (‘PURPA'). This remand throws back
into doubt a