Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MAY 2017

Chevron Deference In Arizona?

In Arizona, like in Washington, a debate is unfolding about how courts should determine "questions of law", and whether an agency's construction of statutes is entitled to deference by the courts.

United StatesEnergy and Natural Resources

In Arizona, like in Washington, a debate is unfolding about how courts should determine "questions of law", and whether an agency's construction of statutes is entitled to deference by the courts. Some refer to this deference as Chevron Deference, stemming from a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision. The recent confirmation proceedings of Justice Neil Gorsuch triggered a spirited debate among policy makers and opinion writers about whether an agency's reading of its statutes should be given any weight when a court reviews questions of law of that agency's decision on appeal.

Given that much of the regulatory authority exercised over businesses, whether in the energy or other commercial field, occurs at the administrative level, whether before the Arizona Corporation Commission, the Department of Environmental Quality, or the Department of Water Resources, attention to the deference question is an important matter, triggering a variety of questions, including:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from