Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 AUGUST 2017

Without WARN-ing: Third Circuit Clarifies WARN Act's Unforeseen Business Circumstances Exception

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Valera v. AE Liquidation, Inc., the Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with five other circuits in holding that WARN notice was not required where an external event outside the employer's control...

United StatesEmployment and HR

What Happened: The Third Circuit Court of Appeals joined five other circuits in holding that the unforeseen business circumstances exception excused WARN notice where an event outside the employer's control that would trigger layoffs was possible but not probable to occur.

The Larger Landscape: While the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Circuits have also adopted a probability standard for determining when the unforeseen business circumstances exception applies, the other circuits have not yet ruled on the issue.

What Employers Should Do: Despite this ruling, employers in all circuits should remember that WARN exceptions—particularly the unforeseen business circumstances exception—are construed narrowly, and they should seek legal advice in determining whether federal and/or state WARN notice may be required.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from